//benchmarks

Engineering outcomes, with the method attached

Representative outcomes from delivered engagements. Each entry describes the kind of system and intervention involved without presenting unsupported numerical claims.

Client names are withheld under NDA. We do not publish numerical benchmark claims here because the underlying reports and raw results are not destination-accessible. These entries are qualitative descriptions of the work performed, not guarantees about what a different system will achieve. Any future numerical claim will include the public evidence needed to evaluate it independently.

API latency

Reduced tail latency on a B2B order API

Query plan and cache behaviour

method

Query plan rewrite, composite indexes, and response caching with tag invalidation.

Sustained throughput

Increased capacity for a read-heavy catalogue service

Connection and read-path efficiency

method

Connection pooling, read replicas, payload compaction, and an asynchronous write path.

Infrastructure cost

Reduced infrastructure spend for a Kubernetes platform

Resource and storage efficiency

method

Right-sized requests and limits from usage data, spot node pools for stateless workloads, and storage-class review.

Deployment lead time

Shortened releases for a monolith with manual steps

Pipeline and migration safety

method

Pipeline parallelisation, test-suite partitioning, an automated migration gate, and blue/green cutover.

Recovery operations

Improved recovery work for a payment integration platform

Observability and restore readiness

method

Structured logging with trace correlation, actionable alerts, documented runbooks, and restore drills.

Peak-load resilience

Reduced failure pressure during seasonal retail traffic

Backpressure and graceful degradation

method

Queue-based load levelling, idempotent retries, and graceful degradation of non-critical reads.

//verification

How we would prove it on your system

The same procedure every performance engagement starts with. It is deliberately boring and entirely reproducible.

  1. 01

    Capture a representative traffic profile from production — endpoint mix, payload sizes, concurrency, cache state.

  2. 02

    Build a k6 or JMeter harness that replays it against a staging environment sized like production, and record the baseline.

  3. 03

    Profile under that load. Fix what the profile shows, in order of measured cost, one change per commit.

  4. 04

    Re-run the identical harness. Publish both runs, including the changes that did not help.